This has no effect if all electronic shutters are used. This has little effect if electronic first curtain shutter is used. This doesn't apply to between the lens shutters if the mirror is locked up or doesn't exist. Therefore, images can be sharper if the camera is oriented so that the direction that most of the vibration takes place in is the direction in which the mounting arrangement is stiffest. Most mirrors swing up and down in landscape mode. Most FP shutters move up and down in landscape orientation. Tripod/head assemblies are usually stiffer for up and down motions than side to side ones. He went on to say that if he wants to take a photo in portrait orientation, he physically backs up to recompose and takes the shot in landscape orientation, then crops it to portrait orientation in post - resulting in a higher resolution image than if he would've taken it in portrait orientation in-camera. I have noticed that images I have taken in portrait orientation also have a lower overall resolution or even image size (in MB) than images I took in landscape orientation. I believe he is correct in this statement. I searched the forums first and did not find anything related to my question so I thought this might be the best place.Ī well known photographer (Scott Kelby) once stated in a photography course he was teaching, that images taken in landscape orientation have a higher resolution than images taken in portrait orientation. I apologize if this is the wrong place for this question.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |